Valerie Harper, best known for her roles in The Mary Tyler Moor Show and Rhoda, has joined the cast of The Two that Came A-Courtin, a TV movie that will appear on the Canadian cable network UP. The show began shooting on Wednesday in Vancouver.
Follow us
The movie is an adaptation of Rhonda Rich's love story about a divorced Georgian writer who moves to Bliss, Mississippi, and finds love in the town's mayor. ?
"UP is thrilled to have the always inspirational Valerie Harper as part of our talented 'The Town That Came A-Courtin,' cast ... this uplifting, sometimes bumpy romance showcases how a community's spirit and good will can help people connect and find each other," UP's Senior Vice President Barbara Fisher said.
The news comes less than five months after Harper announced that she was diagnosed with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in January.
The disease is a rare complication of cancer in which the disease spreads to membranes of the brain and spinal cord. It occurs in an estimated five percent of people with cancer and is often fatal. Survival rate if left untreated is only four to six weeks, but even with treatment, patients are often told that they only have two to three months to live.
What's worse is that as treatments advance for central nervous system and systemic cancers, both of which can lead to the complication, the chances of developing it rise.
Doctors told the 73-year-old Harper that she only had a few months to live, however, she said she was remaining "hopeful."
"The thing I have is - is very rare and it's serious and it's incurable ... so far," she said during an interview with the TODAY show. "So I'm holding onto the 'so far.'"
That perseverance shined through in March when she announced her diagnosis. She said that she was determined to make the most of the time she has left.
"Don't go to the funeral until the day of the funeral," she said. "Live this day."
?
?
Get our most popular stories in a weekly newsletter
Published by Medicaldaily.com
azores emmylou harris disco inferno b.i.g 1000 words ron white ron white
CrunchGov Essential is a scannable roundup of technology’s influence on the day’s big issues. Below a feature post, we present the most thoughtful, outrageous, and inspiring stories told through the web’s best content. Sign up for the morning newsletter here. I’m not a fan of the National Security Agency’s secret dragnet program, but I’m honest enough to admit that I hold a minority view. Recently, a string of stories have wrongly implied that the public has become more privacy-happy in response to the scandal surrounding the leak of the NSA’s telephone and Internet metadata surveillance program. So, to test whether public opinion had actually changed over the last month, we ran our own national opinion surveys and found that, like last fall, about 56 percent of Americans approve of the government collecting their data to investigate terrorism. Perhaps more importantly, Americans think the government is collecting the actual content of email and phone calls, and approval of the program slightly increased in the last month. In future surveys, I’m hopeful that public opinion will, at the very least, support more transparency in mass surveillance programs, but, in the meantime, let’s explore the facts as they are. Little Shift In Public Opinion Since January 2006, about twice as many Americans have consistently thought it more important to “Investigate terrorist threats” than to “Not intrude on privacy”. The last column in the graph is our own Google Survey CrunchGov Poll. You can view the methodology and wording here. Our results show about a 4 percent dip from Pew from last month, but it’s almost within the margin of error (2 percent) and it’s slightly different wording, so it’s doubtful there’s much of a change, if any, in public opinion. Fortunately, Google Survey also gives us an idea of why people answer the way they do. A few responses: –”protect me within the rules of the law” –”investigating terrorist threats at the sake of privacy is fine as long as the information isn’t used for any other purpose and the focus is on terrorism and not anything else” About the NSA specifically, a slight majority (54 percent) favored the current dragnet program. Some of the justifications: –”acceptable for the investigation of terrorist but evidence cannot be used for anything else” –”acceptable if done by keywords” –”i’m not as upset at that invasion of privacy as the irs” Privacy-advocates may not like the way